Banania Game
Dear Community,I am looking for playtesters for three (custom) scenarios I have recently built and playtested on my own.You can be a beginner or an old grognard of the game. To this point, with the recent release of The One Ring, Gollum, Tom Bombadil and probably Wilyador, my short-list of wanted cards have insanely dwindled. I will start with what I don't want to see:- To this point of the game's life with so few cards remaining, I would hate seeing some duplicates (with the one exception). So. no for new Arwens or Barlimans or whatever- No Gandalf the White.
Gandalf became the White because he fought the Balrog. The Boon 'Beyond All Hope' attached to Gandalf is Gandalf the WhiteSoooooo:1.
Banania Game
Spirit Aragorn, like every one else2. The Blue Wizards, though I suspect we won't get them3. Saruman heroThen it's ok, we have basically everything we need. I'd really like a Song-support dedicated hero in the game, and I agree Elena is now our primary target for that.@Onidsen your design is cool enough, though I'm not sure how practical it would be without a bit of deck scrying, which can be done by Imladris Stargazer, that happens to be out of deck.Maybe she could have an additional passive effect, like 'Elena gets +1 Willpower for each player controlling a Song' (way to spread the love), or kind of Response: After you play a Song, Elena gets +1 Willpower until the end of the round. One strong argument for the next cycle being Hobbit is that the past few cycles always have had cards sort of 'announcing' development to come (the Beorning Guardian and Knight of Dale in past cycle), and we start seeing Hobbits in AP5 of this cycle.Furthermore, there is Tom Cotton.That guy boosts Hobbit allies when they enter play, but there are not much Hobbit allies to choose from right?
Fun Banana Games
And the Raise the Shire event is bound to raise no one if you don't have Hobbit in your deck.The player card development has been very consistent this past few years, so I'm sure we're bound for a massive injection of Hobbit cards coming soon.Finally, it's a Lord of the Rings game, and we haven't had yet a Deluxe centered on Hobbits. How silly does that actually sound?. I probably won't be playing any Guarded player card anytime soon. It's really not worth the cost of an extra encounter card. Most of the time, the encounter deck hits you hard and fast, and the first few turns are critical. Do you really want to play a card that will bring into play an extra encounter card?I mean, an extra encounter card.Ok, an extra encounter card.Not until there's some other cards actually supporting the archetype.
Maybe a Bilbo Burglar hero or something.EDIT: I must add that if you can afford to reveal an extra encounter game by playing a Guarded card in the mid or late game, then you're probably already winning, and thus don't need the card. I'm buying both games. The hype is Arkham. It gets more releases.LOTR LCG is still a very lively 7-years old game.We already know there's more to come (Gildor Inglorion) which probably means one cycle. Caleb also hinted at some campaign mode things for LOTR LCG, though that's much more tentative.Releases are slower but steady.So I'm just asking: what's the issue?I'd rather vent my hate and rant at the digital thingy thing which should have its own forums and news tags on FFG's website. Cs 1.6 original weapons models download free. The digital confusion, I think, would harm the physical game much more than Arkham LCG does.